X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:44:30 -0500
Message-Id: <201601061744.u06HiUqo021384@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
CC: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <42CFD5A8-B3C1-4BB2-8D5E-7FF582332FCF@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:22:09 -0500)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] A fileformat library (blind/buried vias)
References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <CAC4O8c980g1gj15=5njstC_BT-WYDgKQx9BRycdFKA8OvgtiOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <B54C0E1F-1986-4C79-9F70-7F1919B8B26D AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c9bxJP1eMG4yz3YwKkQJRmsDGmLQ0aMd5pJRyu0WpdCtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <C1CFCCEE-C64A-4E49-AA64-446C061656D6 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c-zt8B=joDd+ws77D2jt6aZf3MWfR_dAvpzGcNuBrTURQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601030040320 DOT 2176 AT newt> <D9825C8C-B6FD-4C7F-A8D5-B8AF06253B72 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c_R5xWLmzj_cz0g0mPWNs6mR4efjXKGBoup8YO6nwnPTA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <A942261D-7C25-4F2D-9CB1-FFC60FA1C160 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8zk8=Py1yX6fVqF+35SYe39Li=y4jZ8bCeZ1Ev8WccAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160105182120 DOT 3237F809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <8E0210CD-0694-4717-A7B1-3224E39691DA AT sbcglobal DOT net> <CAC4O8c8CxyULauKj+1RT73qdLDnPa1_TOAXY_pXnJNPtnNJYqQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <s6nziwjt23p DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601061228131 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <CAJXU7q-ygqW+Jok60vHC1dre9Q0aF4cUo8_5KXvouTW3L5c57A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160106135339.80f8121dd33!
 cddd92c5acb8a AT gmail DOT com> <42CFD5A8-B3C1-4BB2-8D5E-7FF582332FCF AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> For this pcb non-user, one of the biggest sources of confusion that
> drives me away is that pcb does not really have layers at its
> foundation.

Of course it does.  You just don't agree with its implementation.