X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vwo8o/cV3f8jEQSwaChNGwewUQ5yEf9qETXI5FeMBeQ=; b=G4zExAN3EqxCo6cTyoPvy9ylyHHeWqfHbjDAmotGawHNXNiF+HXDmuLGnfEypzIKhn usV2i81wKg5EYEx08yvGlmm3dcYi/74QZ0a7dRq9e5i4YXpkoRaKS/OO52rrddqCUM9y q2p6+znElR/UvcQafdWMjwUJVTBwvo0VdqJzhMwHAAwyoW7+2GJW4ATSIzf4/WWhqpU4 z8ZLX/NajZLI8X0hUllx7vBbZEACtmWywKdmOS02Dobefq/lzLusfUczZ0ZKNOKhe4zh Gcnv1X1zZad2BXx6kfjppu2zk2tMWXaXMLPew6H+4rrgt/pPSWRoysJoVPI3rbXpRRRu iB1w== X-Received: by 10.28.113.220 with SMTP id d89mr9276529wmi.56.1452070964430; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 01:02:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:02:42 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: some more geometry module tweaks (sorry, wall of text) Message-Id: <20160106100242.40c60b971948626efe04eb32@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > 2. live with imperfection, and don't care too much where it lurks as long > as the code generally works (I believe this is how most of the code > worked in the past) > > 3. live with imperfection, but try to explicitly nail it down to make sure > it's under control I think imperfection mey be a problem for: repeated movements, clerance in combination with DRC for clearance and overlap. Or are there more cases?