X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:55:24 -0500
Message-Id: <201601021755.u02HtOWs020325@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20160102182739.5d195829880cf75768ae0a82@gmail.com>
	(geda-user AT delorie DOT com)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] ideas on slotting and mechanisms for
 grouping/associating heterogenous symbols.
References: <CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300544550 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<87FC7D4C-157A-499E-8B93-97653D6A7C68 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601012231450 DOT 1728 AT newt>
	<AE52C1DB-01A3-43FA-AE8E-68AD33F37180 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<624E6A69-62CE-4FCB-9D44-9FDF036254A3 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<56880043 DOT 7040003 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20160102182739 DOT 5d195829880cf75768ae0a82 AT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> I agree, refdes is good choice.

Note that giving refdes this special meaning, means that gate swapping
(or sharing, across heirarchy instances) between packages is no longer
an option.  Is that a reasonable compromise?