X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ofFBRLl7i/Y/6rTH5tml3LQdtABbDkwWKRLmwpfaR4Q=;
        b=1Eg2TzkPJSGWljHt49TlkNlLXRpTG+5gLJ3fX1CEBc604MQYPs3cFVqwR6tMQJOB98
         l+jneOjZ5x1nb5gqCGnOSCWg3O+Ja8t/267B1VJ6uw1YCilR9u6vDCG7eiFY+lkKNB7/
         Xz3fq2kXYrgzY5LmeIIid61dBclKOjBbnKEL62WcZlJgjstYrXU58tOx1KpfYgfYWU3W
         IzrWucRqD/xuZcUak+hVSWFzukVIMiW8rtObK6dM2NnumJbyh2N+XxUpXNtZkKE4zZWb
         RrPnSXmmOsoWyrHfavAocpYd1ZFhWOJnLYIa+PzeyLJwA6LbOOjLazTTvzNvhKQZ3jLy
         QDoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.6.196 with SMTP id d4mr78426756wja.120.1451611929117;
 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:32:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <155DC4CF-77B1-4A45-982C-DE9A452D6BD4@noqsi.com>
References: <CAJXU7q8BsPKicvAgFvaigLBmT9CS3dJ_eFYR84mwWEg-=Vyg8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9RrJO8=rLG5rdnH_MHQRCO8oghxoGrsao7NfSMEPb+0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151230181538 DOT 32790b5b AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<155DC4CF-77B1-4A45-982C-DE9A452D6BD4 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:32:09 -0900
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c-z7zCWoD+7SoefswGD0FLnU6kLLXvvP9UPfLxaafMeBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Positive discussion topic thread
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d4976630cd905283bbdc6
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--047d7b5d4976630cd905283bbdc6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:39 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

>
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> > My first thought is really have a survey/vote/election on the following
> > topics:
> >
> > 1. Do we need to separate geda and pcb?
>
> Yes!
>

No!  Because they have almost the same users and developers.


> > 2. Do we need a new name for pcb?
>
> I think so. It=E2=80=99s ungoogleable. gEDA confusingly supports export t=
o many
> PCB flows that are not pcb.
>

I don't care and I doubt it matters.

> 3. Who is going to be a leader? Nominate yourself with some program.
>
> I nominate Vladimir for gEDA, Peter Clifton for pcb.
>

DJ for gEDA, Peter Clifton for pcb.

Britton

--047d7b5d4976630cd905283bbdc6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:39 AM, John Doty <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:jpd AT noqsi DOT com" target=3D"_blank">jpd AT noqsi DOT com</a>&gt;</span> w=
rote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br>
On Dec 30, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Lev (<a href=3D"mailto:leventelist AT gmail DOT com"=
>leventelist AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">g=
eda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda=
-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; My first thought is really have a survey/vote/election on the followin=
g<br>
&gt; topics:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; 1. Do we need to separate geda and pcb?<br>
<br>
</span>Yes!<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style=3D"">No!=C2=A0 Becaus=
e they have almost the same users and developers.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">
&gt; 2. Do we need a new name for pcb?<br>
<br>
</span>I think so. It=E2=80=99s ungoogleable. gEDA confusingly supports exp=
ort to many PCB flows that are not pcb.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div=
 style=3D"">I don&#39;t care and I doubt it matters.</div><div><br></div><b=
lockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px =
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">
&gt; 3. Who is going to be a leader? Nominate yourself with some program.<b=
r>
<br>
</span>I nominate Vladimir for gEDA, Peter Clifton for pcb.<br></blockquote=
><div><br></div><div style=3D"">DJ for gEDA, Peter Clifton for pcb.</div><d=
iv>=C2=A0</div><div style=3D"">Britton</div></div><br></div></div>

--047d7b5d4976630cd905283bbdc6--