X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rdx7NGfsaRdZ01CA1kpyrhAfr4inMeAGzicNG1Fa3wM=; b=SyHHgpDKySmg9wrfmtXn6CwfjaGophwV4oSHjUDc29CeXPj5JoTCOczNzSrXN5nmiW Ft8Lq7tVyU3mc/r7vRqb2LPcuUlrn6HAfYt7+IgB+CjVYhXNwOEg8TTQ/0gAu5PWyQCA MR0ZMdkRmrpAS7krmo5vfn+uYDG5RYD/Cd3AMxLRo/XcjX227xXcgwZWVhR+dZheK2SU E08iSLdiLbBAOk/ZMnspO2W0tL3FnQzVyJl3PpIlf7l4HgJioKgvRLlu+QFpNGCqpiUH WlQIyNpltqtsCXyel4iK/oP4Fv0bM/VaLkHhG9aFpcaZ+kr7f+DI2C72++6w++rIOeEt lpNA== X-Received: by 10.112.157.69 with SMTP id wk5mr25488529lbb.74.1451586623153; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:30:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:30:18 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Positive discussion topic thread Message-Id: <20151231193018.c516910194679270c622c4e8@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20151230181538 DOT 32790b5b AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201512310212 DOT tBV2C3MK029574 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151231024721 DOT GC19555 AT localhost DOT localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:22:03 +0800 "Atommann (atommann AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > 2015-12-31 10:47 GMT+08:00 Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] : > > nnnn > > I would suggest just 'geda-pcb'. This name wouldn't break our > > community and possibly wouldn't insult anybody. It wouldn't > > require any changes in our current documentation, either. > > How about a shorter version 'gpcb'? > This follows the naming convention, like gschem, gnetlist, etc. > > -- > Best regards, > Atommann Sound good.