X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4A30C970-BBA7-402E-8F5D-23F33910045C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of gschem) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:41:39 -0700 Message-Id: <7C27D3F4-9CC2-46DB-BE88-77564F3FC0FC@noqsi.com> References: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com> <449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_4A30C970-BBA7-402E-8F5D-23F33910045C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Dec 29, 2015, at 9:17 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > But then why gschem doesn't ask the netlist infra? Because nobody has scripted that. > Or why the netlist engine doesn't generate an ".lst" (staying with the = object example) gschem can read? Because nobody has written the scripts. I note that I have a gnet-tsv = (12 lines of Scheme) that outputs a format that pins2gsch (28 lines of = AWK) can read, so I *could* generate a gschem-readable schematic page = representing every connection in a design (but with no graphics). The design of geda-gaf makes these little tools easy to write. When you = put two or three of them together you can do all kinds of useful = automation. I should put gnet-tsv on gedasymbols. > And why gschem tries to understand slotting in the first place, and = doesn't leave it for the netlister? I think that=92s because the concept of forward annotation to an = as-built schematic was not on the table when it was implemented. The = developers thought that users would need to see pin numbers in the = source schematics. I suppose there are many who will still want this = even after we construct a good way to make as-built schematics. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_4A30C970-BBA7-402E-8F5D-23F33910045C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWhAlDAAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRuE4P/2xJcn3lisZzllqSeFZ+K0dq ywGj1qmSMPDyPPoV7CafnmjhToxH0suduvRCk5BpYcUI1Vo1xXddwowJogZ4Myb1 e7rQsnd+GnsPbyw23ZEs3iKuTo2xAPJM9lBWGx+9qRHFSUWPOGJSuPrt7KMxogsg 8UGDP9QFL664MS+8nl4kHaeemu6huZOuK4QsYyVmg0U0smJKNPR8VVl6ZnnATSVD 1B1JsKeWX7twDuM/928b1UsqrdIEkANl+Z5RtLcyS1EZGmEaz9C3Da0Gm0uUaIAG fcU47M0y4T/ZG4IH1W7NzWKH41lbCGLnHwNqPgVjh9a5JkXKQxhY3PmLQtVur5B8 KKQqBlaLqLALInCrgi0q9r2n3DnDNQBeYPyxTWH/Jb1jnX0b8CJpd4xEwIwIVaFE +E50/Gdr73UUcrgGyVJRJIIDa+YgoULimFpnKHpGXrVCKJpp0x6S4mj2tLU+jmk0 /Dxv2loSKIdaV0o+McF4jDayDV/S9iEXLDkTwNfWYwIO5wCN9gEdDjBP0aGl0zcA R+O9UzcRH1bZhUQ3x/c/wgIDahQbTFc6dS89+GhtbkCnW/sK6Pk9FMawPMWKFjf3 nVIDHx2/EoQvMPgyEWCGKzGMuw6k+5RGwOQJhwAXzYmIRaZpubqggT4RluL8bk+W +aEJZAXZWF5GSSpoYrdo =jopO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_4A30C970-BBA7-402E-8F5D-23F33910045C--