X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8B2E3AB1-C59A-4DEF-872A-EDCB25A83167"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of gschem) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:34:15 -0700 Message-Id: <6645DDA7-7371-4E11-8B8D-82279DCC7C41@noqsi.com> References: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com> <449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_8B2E3AB1-C59A-4DEF-872A-EDCB25A83167 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Dec 30, 2015, at 12:17 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, John Doty wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, John Doty wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:29 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> A common netlist/bom format with a canonical form (so equivalent = netlists would be identical) would be a useful intermediate. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Could work. To me, the current patch format is much cleaner. I = already have fully working code both in pcb-rnd and gschem. If you = implement an alternative solution that is at least as capable, let me = know. >>>>=20 >>>> I?m not saying get rid of your patch format. But you took a = shortcut generally not available by having pcb make the patch directly. >>>=20 >>> False. I did make a shortcut, but on a totally different level of = abstraction. >>=20 >> Only available to the geda-gaf->pcb flow. >=20 > Nope, it's available in the pcb->geda-gaf flow. Not due to the format, = not due to the shortcut. Only because I did't implement it for anything = else. >=20 > Please provide your reasoning why anything else couldn't emit a = similar format! Not directly from a tool whose code you can=92t modify. Indirectly = through through additional scripts, of course, which is my proposal. How would you implement this for Osmond PCB? John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_8B2E3AB1-C59A-4DEF-872A-EDCB25A83167 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWg4j3AAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRaoIP/jR0NtE9JMP55zTQR5VUQZuI 3DLi6rxRx+SAa5T71Vnh/riLelzl1VvTPp99A93Yc2ZhEhWaigcdtARiUNmbauYG d/d6Y20CwhqcnyFBngz2V0Yo/dWIiuVlL9J4EzJ4Gr4mLgrxg+7sy+YQTvhD08km 6pKF5JLpaCQRtbEyrHmDiNo3K9PHvbWtZvsWxKVSwA3eM9q8MEXQEaVg7uYyJk80 Q6dzGGOmL+twWqVBeGCNypAynZYvlkFVPFIQFax/UXm+15Hyxf2jYWVPHu1UtiL2 dKPI06JOrqaicbTziOWZisAHedFUd+8NWn0wd9sXSNnjx70wvgsdwWW5+vms4Y7Z nfMPiBNwbog0eLHF0898fG3/WZU/DvRgSy9fFOtGrn9KufJC4mUY7ZjqLVVyP/WK RnYmo19pE7geVSOxB+ZB2j3/wdp4IA0S9bwbykg1vYPvWXZ8WIprGDGvUlkfkP6v SoTvujEzh0AxOPe7W/mJUWJiXRseCVDlO6BMKPgXNMQZW6I95GKX99BEQGx3r3ZO ZPFkx7RXnnsyOzHsyiHaBmrUuvhK+rlmZ1k86TxkE5gGVgL9pYLuLQEt91h3Ux8F Z4ttUQeHSSY080+7M7JqjA5gBkN1Uzs3Rp0Zl7kapHFQi9kPZrq4rN5SCNujSGvq 0HXJNtd+7HNSJYbPGKut =ppfW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_8B2E3AB1-C59A-4DEF-872A-EDCB25A83167--