X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 07:04:49 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of
 gschem)
In-Reply-To: <F676A431-C1E3-454B-B156-A3D8C6497B37@noqsi.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1512300702490.9035@igor2priv>
References: <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512290406210 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
 <20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhQ363RydhBJKMnNX5sLOkD1K4qVwb-PPwov3MT3D6MfdQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhQD1b0NKLWNYyB-m1whgYJZeEH9syzSs4OZt+22D5hooA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300441390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <E8E70657-A89A-4F51-B779-C24E029ABECA AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhRLu4-C0U7t7SjqFp=b++t3A+hxzGoVna8Q4Tx_sALxFw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <F676A431-C1E3-454B-B156-A3D8C6497B37 AT noqsi DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, John Doty wrote:

>
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> 1. PCB exports a set of commands (I call it a patch)
>>>
>>> An interface. Good. Is it documented?
>>
>> So far no one except me is interested in merging it. Why document
>> something no one else has accepted?
>
> Documentation is an important part of acceptance. Gnet-spice-sdb remains very important because it?s better documented than gnet-spice-noqsi even though the latter is more capable. Mea culpa. So many things to finish?

I did tell you the link to the documentation.

Again, the docuementation was public _before_ I started any 
implementation. I ran a course on the mailing list to get feedback about 
it. 90% of the traffic was obviosuly senseless flame, but the document and 
concept did change a bit (before the implementation) due to the rest 10%.