X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A684117B-EB18-4B0D-8C69-FB120F8E4323"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of gschem)
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1512300611420.9035@igor2priv>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 22:52:05 -0700
Message-Id: <C3D7084C-1A24-4266-806D-C337CFA17322@noqsi.com>
References: <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512290406210 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhQ363RydhBJKMnNX5sLOkD1K4qVwb-PPwov3MT3D6MfdQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <449C2A4A-814E-4858-ACB3-82807A80BE8A AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhQD1b0NKLWNYyB-m1whgYJZeEH9syzSs4OZt+22D5hooA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300441390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <E8E70657-A89A-4F51-B779-C24E029ABECA AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300611420 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_A684117B-EB18-4B0D-8C69-FB120F8E4323
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:29 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:

>>=20
>> A common netlist/bom format with a canonical form (so equivalent =
netlists would be identical) would be a useful intermediate.
>=20
> Could work. To me, the current patch format is much cleaner. I already =
have fully working code both in pcb-rnd and gschem. If you implement an =
alternative solution that is at least as capable, let me know.

I=92m not saying get rid of your patch format. But you took a shortcut =
generally not available by having pcb make the patch directly. Some more =
general approach is needed. Common, canonical forms of netlist and BOM =
could drive patch file generation, and they could be useful for other =
things (as others have noted).

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_A684117B-EB18-4B0D-8C69-FB120F8E4323
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWg3EGAAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRplYQAKWUETdbaztG8Q0ibXnY5O7x
JOy6k2yDqi0itnvQuVqV9e7FtPCwCYw4L/0lei8g+Vmi8ZN8UA3+ENFxPf38GIwl
2DX0NmqV35gVnyM1IXGl7Rk2bqAVC9PT7yOtdGrdudGDMS5AM8Eo25JJy6cb1W7Z
uKsDyg85rN4DzV2oJUxFEsbJnXu/V+l9wQQmgG7e1bJicpGkBbAeq8tUEE4tuV4J
hf9BGIxUa9I7w0XuOiObFu4ji91WFQMht08f2xajERGtbDfUOLkFg9i4mtohXjVh
+5TIel1dqzVJ1ECFWvmWg/pZDd24Sie+SGAOOiW+F+HMBBUaeI92hrK0mmE8yWUx
u4EYWP/vcZJgIUD3OMPYsI1oBs7iarAXwWhahhV+fZsCfC387M5PtFFLdGTv3ty7
3jq0/BruVNFf6ecQQ3pCVeN0zDVYi7NxLH556j0tFDWn2XnTbOSlFuvEumj7Iyok
aV4e5AwW/OQbSPkpmC5NFtRLDz/zprPauCcvR5BvWbCa3YchEXShkIf0skLw7uQ3
SDSuP+ip5fwglKSqEgPEcupW3XYluLsJPvjcJpvQPFKXLyqWiX/wdyTcoR0yL3Vi
Hon8uMHb/SEP4SkDZLOhfzNIEhLu23SjVcZFEzEyBmNRSGKCEmOrRzZSXpCS4aNG
T138q/EEktsk6fZj58Mj
=UHfz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_A684117B-EB18-4B0D-8C69-FB120F8E4323--