X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 05:41:15 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user]
 Project leadership
In-Reply-To: <E40181DE-8BBD-4138-B7A3-0D52DDC4B33A@noqsi.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1512300538320.9035@igor2priv>
References: <CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151229212943 DOT 2d486c8c AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <322D36D8-DAB6-4117-B22B-8FF515B00D2B AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhTxstgMkt4g4Fq_7nx7FGQQeLUXkBskT7wDc7746jFodw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <538AF43A-E94A-433B-B050-AD5C4D48EC4F AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhRf0pMRazy90t=DN_=hmM81TMG9UkLp-cch3=W+3aLFJg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E40181DE-8BBD-4138-B7A3-0D52DDC4B33A AT noqsi DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, John Doty wrote:

>
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 8:24 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:20 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You don?t have to make unwelcome changes to extend the toolkit. That?s an advantage of a toolkit. Use it.
>>>>
>>>> Unwelcome wagon?
>>>
>>> New construction is welcome. Dynamiting a foundation to make an opening because you don?t want to use the door is not.
>>
>> Why do you always assume anyone else's additions are going to be the
>> equivalent to destroying everything that already exists?
>
> Because I?ve been burned.

The other day I had an accident on my way to my workplace. Your 
conclusion: every single time I attempt to leave the house I will get run 
over by an 5 ton, 6 wheel truck. Instantly, the very moment the door 
closes behind me.