X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 05:25:45 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
In-Reply-To: <CAC4O8c9VHFXCqFiJqMi2P4yPLuWhZFbzhyTKn-6yzUo+SgRHXA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1512300520110.9035@igor2priv>
References: <CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <201512282324 DOT tBSNOIqW029691 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <E6DDDCA9-3C61-4A1C-AAE0-779D414A7D40 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhRZzAQAghLQJwcLA3dspbTP=a6N2Bwdy602uw8mRwEvrA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c9VHFXCqFiJqMi2P4yPLuWhZFbzhyTKn-6yzUo+SgRHXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-138770276-1451449545=:9035"
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--0-138770276-1451449545=:9035
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE



On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user=
@delorie.com] wrote:


>John doesn't want gschem to get busted because he's been burned by
>changes in the past.=C2=A0 He's welcome to sound the alarm over anything c=
oncrete
>that he knows may cause breakage.=C2=A0 We can object if his criticism is =
too
>vague of unfairly singles out pcb for criticism.

I'd agree if it was the case. My impression is that he doesn't want gschem=
=20
to be CHANGED at all. Which is fine. Gschem is finished and perfect and=20
whle for him. He should fork and keep the version he likes the best. This=
=20
copy won't be ruined by changes made to other copies by other people.

We do need users of different workflow to spot holes in new ideas. I doubt=
=20
we need users from any workflow to block ALL new ideas instantly.=20
Sometimes without even looking at the idea/code. See my recent case when I=
=20
used word "libgeda" together with something like "add code".

--0-138770276-1451449545=:9035--