X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A4267DDC-1FB7-43E2-ADAF-6921FF0D6DE7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:37:12 -0700 Message-Id: <9F919A41-806B-4E99-B4D2-A153B3BFA0EE@noqsi.com> References: <5AC3D5C5-144F-41AE-9562-47BC34D9047F AT noqsi DOT com> <20151222193859 DOT 26898 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151223202851 DOT 637d5b1f AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20151223195846 DOT 8392 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <5681E059 DOT 9070202 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20151229171221 DOT GB3752 AT localhost DOT localdomain> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_A4267DDC-1FB7-43E2-ADAF-6921FF0D6DE7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) = [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >=20 >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via = geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>=20 >>> appreciate Edward's work though I feel we see geda-gaf future >>> differently. I, for one, wish to unify geda core functions and >>> rewrite them in Scheme in order to get rid of our C-Scheme-C >>> structure, throw out duplicated functionality, simplify internal >>> structure, and make functions less opaque for both C and Scheme >>> levels. (BTW, gschem has REPL now, are you aware of it? ;)) >>=20 >> A while back we debated this. I though we agreed on de-emphasising >> scheme's use? (You and peter b were the only too proponents for it) I >> could be miss interpreting your plan here but it sounds like you are >> going to replace more of the C with Scheme. >=20 > I=92d rather have libgeda written in pure C and provide support for = GIR. > Then, other languages can use libgeda through the FFI. The bindings > would be automatically generated, so we don=92t have to code them by = hand. Sounds like Roland=92s ambitions for Xorn. I=92m impressed at what he=92s = accomplished, but so far nobody, as far as I know, has been able to = comprehend his approach enough to extend it. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_A4267DDC-1FB7-43E2-ADAF-6921FF0D6DE7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWguDoAAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRFvwP/3tdVLdRmnOiSAGouDWQNP3N bIS8hfZ6fLAsPbE8pIaotN25YC+LWf72sugGjL3p0KQEnq6/iCAiE3dN4fePPweu jeG4BUoZNEj/4UTquieVnMBhoEF7HfcT2IAodPsJVcrq2YCpP3LA+qylXPpObDD5 ExU/dCjxjj9Kuk1zPVwWfpBfzdgs/H7TZg/D1fNmXv/mx6vTTofXniXGO8TteNC7 QVxIdgwpLmAktpI4dxJa2Uu9dkM3ot5giqBDxVy1qBsQ2tOpamKLf5fmSmuWMgQS cROMcZRWDPgrWKaz7rvgP5T2k3KgrclpkvTeo1C+Ax0h5xIbdZV7TOKOMtEvzEt8 ALGZaHoNSP+R1Et0rd/3jWijq40nofmMeYXU0kqAhjvAD5UOp19cbqwh4A/6vxVC 7ghKm2dmZiGxaXnsaxlG4AI/Moj6zErweekOlAaNQiHiJAIH63B2qcOLI8dTPVOV eIeWP1wxq6Ti0vXVX+161oz0qsFO0uJQi5C6HcSjemY8jb2ctQE3x9oUlGP8oL4k VnaywTwQfA0ZgMvSqUxBsxkWX0IJqp7rU8+O+gkv6n7ITrh6sdoWxjWTS/bVgbOj lzNdio+cK42hgARR7F/QRXJz8s7v3ueJMmVMjsl0cnPFis7C7Q5uxxFHQp/mdOWI Pa1Vn38izNa9a2OlAWZx =rCrk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_A4267DDC-1FB7-43E2-ADAF-6921FF0D6DE7--