X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5OEijnzb06NV9Fkok4I3gI7zin26yfhSZc9JAfsChCI=; b=atMGinJocQVfV1ZTwxTG1Bn654pK8eQ4EbUJENKlL6ETYnaouNhGdlUG2/OgjZYJ6U Qc5vmeWM2B9dhSxRjC8hqKXLIBrfXGz/Tsf7Tyi9XQO7khfkMBTLC1aIxa27mqWgtBbM wGY56LK52LsqnUnc88XBrNOAfhSxnuuIL+uA5zNFISFU0ttdvPbg+gtUl2FDZScujlz8 YPD8RES0N5iZBsaZw6sSK2NdvkLz7BagAoVR2V249GVVnLTPN7CYzw1uMTumNE0X40Wh KF8PwrsaM9kuS/V4sforh5jmyLjXOkOOgRwdjXpp9Hv7I2yNeh//sw62WJ2PlpvyRiHl sS8w== X-Received: by 10.194.110.35 with SMTP id hx3mr74196857wjb.0.1451377528881; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:25:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:25:23 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (generic, buses) Message-Id: <20151229092523.e1209f12e48386ec92457dee@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <60951D11-68FB-4184-910F-A201B7C2D079@noqsi.com> References: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <60951D11-68FB-4184-910F-A201B7C2D079 AT noqsi DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > On 28 December 2015 at 20:48, John Doty wrote: > >> There are really two projects here: The original gEDA (now confusingly > >> called geda-gaf), and pcb. I think everyone agrees that pcb needs a lot of > >> work. On the other hand, geda-gaf is matiure, effective, and easy to extend > >> with scripting. Pcb development requires a great deal of collaboration. > >> Geda-gaf development mostly does not, as anybody can write and publish a > >> script. > > > > I would not call a generic schematic capture tool mature until it > > provides the designer use of buses and bus pins in his design without > > the need to actually name the nets to have connection. > > I believe Paul Tan does this in his Verilog flow. > > > > > -- > > Svenn > > > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com Then it is certainly very generic: ASIC, Circuit boards, cables connecting circuit boards, Verilog, VHDL? Nicklas Karlsson