X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=PAdWrhE1ASEUIGmjcCo24LgZC66hr5WXqM8oYaPPk08=;
        b=gz2x0qjZwcpM/Nrd0OO7nporgRfJ16qHm1kN57tWodBVlM1wnXXs1nOz2iy7sTjlTu
         vYQPbt2NvcrWya62fjx/UZ3BJuBIA5ez6x5foJOOvDpBo7cV7YbGp82Y7TcGTvOO7Wt7
         Lcoo8I1JZ1UBXj9mwuLWxjYywp64MUUbS/bA80mtvDYjWBYJGeBI5m3fQa9SdguHBGjZ
         uHbZD3zakGpzmPsjMH4ltHkh+KWXgrX7RD8R1N2qapAvrIoTaWneRPMiUXAw5/8cTuz1
         DXRkK5Ab7p7PlvPWpj9ciDecy5AbOYRq6pv4gK++CWTLnzaVrFVsio52YKH1A6WCeE7D
         ldWQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.48.194 with SMTP id w185mr53389540wmw.73.1451162839109;
        Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:47:13 +0100
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] using DRC for other clearance values -- probably a
 bad idea
Message-Id: <20151226214713.61c9396af946d08bcdbac081@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4O8c9zz3X9K-E4fAwjKEdLjNiSLo6FTObDo7vbCm+0yb6ipg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC4O8c9zz3X9K-E4fAwjKEdLjNiSLo6FTObDo7vbCm+0yb6ipg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> I previously said existing DRC could be used for this.  Unfortunately I
> guess that for cases where larger clearances are desired, it's often
> because of electromagnetic considerations, which means that it's probably
> really an inter-layer requirement, which means existing DRC code would not
> be useful.  Sorry.
> 
> Britton

Are they allowed to come close to each other on different layers? Or not?


Nicklas Karlsson