X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=klq3CwDoluhAz+hkuA5ujjxaQFzcrhHYaGtqmUJ2n/8=;
        b=bWLAFxcjEwQiBWbctNa3+fq+Vh5PkoUuFLAOAsRO0MB6b1xPElTPstIMvboHsg4YgU
         bFPj6LpfFTWd4/SeGkmoS3yvcbfjNQv5M5oZtioIFRyuEs4I8zUA7XoL/J3HF3hF+HLH
         LHTZXSeecQ1VmL6bWGA/C8nBXxVxevIllWppHPlqrID9iyOl2mlbxSeSBsmDfSQQPQZu
         DpEVedkztZapMoiecn6rsli31tiPnCedX7LaGvOvhS3GnOegHFKDjOV8PkZDCra0KkJx
         DzB8HVRl9TKXBLTOaxRbMtPNK3lPO56qtLUNHAn1h2RD7uViF/GItbNOQNcWvoy6hENV
         DhCA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.245.167 with SMTP id xp7mr7129527obc.63.1450837561242;
 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:26:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOFvGD7+KgJWBT4mqA-f3G-4fTvxqyjbyJ24-bm8-wY7ca4qwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOFvGD7+KgJWBT4mqA-f3G-4fTvxqyjbyJ24-bm8-wY7ca4qwg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 02:26:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJXU7q9bOG+5i1RbCNdpUTNAGQCkwK12sd9n_xrL7DP2X=EU3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Regarding PCB Improved Object Selection Branch?
From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2abe476fc0905278771f4
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--001a11c2abe476fc0905278771f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 23 Dec 2015 02:05, "Jason White (whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Where can I find this "improved object selection" branch of PCB? (I
> would like to build it, try it)

I'm not sure if this was a reference to a couple of patches in one of my
branches or something else.

(Edit - just saw the email from Britton)

The patches in my branch related to tweaking the object search preference
order, especially relative to the grid snapping. I found stock PCB to be a
a bit quirky in this regard too.

This is the kind of change that people need to try and go "yeah, that's
better - and doesn't break anything unexpected" before pushing upstream.

Sounds like at least Bert's is a good candidate for that, and I'd vouch for
mine as not having caused me any problems too. I don't think mine
specifically addressed line endpoints - so the two might be complimentary
if the merge ok.

Peter

--001a11c2abe476fc0905278771f4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On 23 Dec 2015 02:05, &quot;Jason White (<a href=3D"mailto:whitewaterssoftw=
areinfo AT gmail DOT com">whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href=3D"m=
ailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>]&quot; &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Hello,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Where can I find this &quot;improved object selection&quot; branch of =
PCB? (I<br>
&gt; would like to build it, try it)</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I&#39;m not sure if this was a reference to a couple of patc=
hes in one of my branches or something else.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">(Edit - just saw the email from Britton)</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">The patches in my branch related to tweaking the object sear=
ch preference order, especially relative to the grid snapping. I found stoc=
k PCB to be a a bit quirky in this regard too.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">This is the kind of change that people need to try and go &q=
uot;yeah, that&#39;s better - and doesn&#39;t break anything unexpected&quo=
t; before pushing upstream.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Sounds like at least Bert&#39;s is a good candidate for that=
, and I&#39;d vouch for mine as not having caused me any problems too. I do=
n&#39;t think mine specifically addressed line endpoints - so the two might=
 be complimentary if the merge ok.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Peter<br>
</p>

--001a11c2abe476fc0905278771f4--