X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20151222223100.8660.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:31:00 +0100
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
Mail-Followup-To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <CAJXU7q990v-KKB--=839DvsRHDg-QeaCb2bREziv0BoiNMH6rw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151222215211 DOT 5490 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAJXU7q-A4FpmWwTSwpLbiD3FO7D7=FpHtJ6O=a9fyH6B+uXOKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJXU7q-A4FpmWwTSwpLbiD3FO7D7=FpHtJ6O=a9fyH6B+uXOKA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I remember a little abrasiveness from the 2007 days, but she's
> being pleasant enough at the moment.
> 
> Concept still looks sound.

Yes I agree completely on both points and I look forward to great
contributions! :)

Verilog for netlists was quite a popular topic at last FOSDEM, there
is a strong tendency going on here!


//Peter