X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ro5HSyNm6LRGtSIdM81CZYfCcIOdotBAvybmO5HKr0A=; b=e7Em1ZXZdwPzbV80Q0u2RqDWAJyWNzg8GavNNtITk+glMTNsTCXu4LUHiAI3IDXvmp lssoUCSQ93kirje3zBrevpqc3DJmKLla2Oy1f03ln8hn8Jp165etE3aQ+IQC88XxwTUX 0zYolUIV2H5gUf+1IPw7ajxZuPg8V3naMpV54msQ75AYk5YYEEoAm1CPqSWr4+BpwpXR +87nzqEZWjonKpLj5ET/R8xe/pwEegph02LjuNQS2OwN3Xr8+ebdjLiUSWxpvPKzMQAj pf9yAMpu2qHedJ7kHQx+1TK2FlKmge6Ga/hA80DDS+OZsGRwQd+c5Cl2fRdFs4AHwJyu 1cfA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.169.138 with SMTP id s132mr11139942oie.101.1450821913046; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:05:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151222215211.5490.qmail@stuge.se> References: <1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20151222215211 DOT 5490 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:05:12 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk I remember a little abrasiveness from the 2007 days, but she's being pleasant enough at the moment. Concept still looks sound. Peter On 22 December 2015 at 21:52, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> I just spent a little time digging into your source files for that design... >> >> I am really impressed, and think the concept is excellent > > This person has background within other projects which isn't great, > there was some upset and behavior which wasn't really supporting the > project but really only their own cause. I hope for the best; I > haven't seen anything problematic in the gEDA community. > > > //Peter