X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=TIrmdtd73la0IOv22NPOATUf3LRdZOBA4vjf9pl3EMY=;
        b=GtiejxfZypODRn9gcOPC0dYR3wUoOnh0AamYFqhAGXBw/Gp20B09g3fIBH7BmaKd8h
         x2ksZaKOn9yZTgd1dqkjz9czIJYrHxOjwvg1MOjIOYy87K+6q+tB4NOZA1j+/+XfwHvZ
         lWmsTLgXhzcPG7zcOsM78XZFK3I8CkJnrE9NX/SxPqM7zLzV6ygPxIRWXKtrDxvqkidZ
         myvYaiohLYslFlN5R5tY/zF5y0cyK0k7KR9s+0j5i/BsZak6DllwW48Wx/9U5PQZV66/
         2nKeT3H17Gz1exa9Z8OR8DvNrXFZMh4dP0ZfMUM4wNQ76JRdDLWMWIL/+2osnt6fHgOQ
         Bwqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.6.98 with SMTP id z2mr28302615wjz.101.1450811103122;
 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:05:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151222141124.d2281037717436f45ab48e41@gmail.com>
References: <CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151221030451 DOT 02399163eb3e40f21c622c41 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1PTdeCZdT+SthHwQtaxC4x06MbBQmxRcK3DZyQ-jfw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151221203331 DOT 20837 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAJXU7q_XOJStJXhD547xW-+XROkBhctmMAWB-jm0cez5UvgZ7w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1ri4UMeYr01Af-AH005DkLboKO72nGao+ByGmqA51W-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222002012 DOT a88d7fe32a9336855eccd1d0 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9dU=z5KZmgsh+Vau4zZNfEh4Awr5xdzL=6xhimLYVNLw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220421160 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<201512220412 DOT tBM4CJxb018546 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512220528100 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAJXU7q-cnJ5cMv_qFzHWiNmcMPwoLHnBRou3FS-0NGwo5mTYVQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222115437 DOT f3f37bdecc55dbead13736b1 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q_6mkw8bnXo6+XJRsTytdqPYMebHa748CC2pPso0+LcEg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151222141124 DOT d2281037717436f45ab48e41 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:05:03 -0900
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c-FT2Byx2pDR5hsJeTxYMSCg3ZL7JNsjBDLLO6M3i6_4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] ... New Hierarchical Data Structure? (Academic papers)
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d3e6470223a0527814815
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--047d7b5d3e6470223a0527814815
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (
nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <
geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> > Copyright of a published academic paper almost always resides with the
> > journal. ...
> > ...
>
> It is rather interesting because academic papers are usually written on
> universities funded by tax money.
>
> Or is it common with universities funded by pupils in USA? In such case
> then are they allowed to say it is a university?
>

Yes.  The situation at the moment in the US is the public pays for the
research then gets to pay again to copyright and patent holders at
spin-offs partnered with universities.  It was supposed to help engineering
catch up with using stuff coming out of basic research, but in practice
it's a big burden on the most useful inventions (which would otherwise get
competing implementations anyway).

--047d7b5d3e6470223a0527814815
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (<a href=3D"mailto:nickla=
s DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com">nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href=3D"m=
ailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT del=
orie.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span cl=
ass=3D"">&gt; Copyright of a published academic paper almost always resides=
 with the<br>
</span>&gt; journal. ...<br>
&gt; ...<br>
<br>
It is rather interesting because academic papers are usually written on uni=
versities funded by tax money.<br>
<br>
Or is it common with universities funded by pupils in USA? In such case the=
n are they allowed to say it is a university?<br></blockquote><div><br></di=
v><div style=3D"">Yes.=C2=A0 The situation at the moment in the US is the p=
ublic pays for the research then gets to pay again to copyright and patent =
holders at spin-offs partnered with universities.=C2=A0 It was supposed to =
help engineering catch up with using stuff coming out of basic research, bu=
t in practice it&#39;s a big burden on the most useful inventions (which wo=
uld otherwise get competing implementations anyway).</div></div><br></div><=
/div>

--047d7b5d3e6470223a0527814815--