X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=9/xAPdrSd1kP41ShZZyXEWH9Aewb2pOB75NP+mSOBe4=;
        b=uMcf/zDpzotBcfGkAuvUvcBUyx5V7eVvrTFfK4dunNznf5RXRnwUI4VbW61c9ydSpu
         a/D1/OHLXc1S1sghxoVYFv0oQOO2u0EN0Zn3uCMNkC2jUl1Dj4/Dl3OSSeviyNWGn+HQ
         Kt2PqjRVWBxZdYZ5L18te7jlOTgDN657CGjGce1py+dCenWicj5OJ18JzCByzIpcPijL
         Pf9w9N0CZXfOLQFnRMc1zUwQ3kJPWUO5yuRhyRTKWAueCtImSI8hRb9FetNDKr5YxmmT
         ShoSRd8Uwdde2zvyRK/HUQtgJqLvv3wFXSHQuMosM/3SDPfPbEIBeOe3ZWvC22ZEdWYc
         un0g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.169.138 with SMTP id s132mr9617537oie.101.1450791490000;
 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:38:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151221023730.1cc8237648d37123bbc9fc5c@gmail.com>
References: <CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151221023730 DOT 1cc8237648d37123bbc9fc5c AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:38:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJXU7q-Z_gEYpQ=Q6GRXVCQcfPSfwu66DYnmqVptwaC-dB_Zkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Proposing a New Hierarchical Data Structure?
From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 21 December 2015 at 01:37, Nicklas Karlsson
(nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> * Ability to remove solder mask from arbitrary traces and areas

I already implemented this (not in an ideal way, but as an extension
of our existing layer system)... had thought it was upstream, but
having just checked - no, it was waiting for further testing (which
I'd say had happened now, since both myself, and the person I
implemented it for, have been using it for some time now).

I will try at some point (perhaps not until February or later), to
untangle what patches I have ready for upstream, and get them pushed.


Peter