X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I4tiEC3Moqd6XTjXLqUESTQYDZg6IWR7vxpW3EuMm9c=; b=RLIaCtC6Rz0NiwAsSBAy6Mz66eZ17t6RpcKHItOnEq77iabsmFmOtZW8CRiUzFG52S Q28wR4FcZl4uNqI35xpficuNjWwkImwzX0CUJFJuLO8ousiPSYOI/Z26yxN+Ew2tFRyI Xt1kVMyKRBmY7sv2dTYpxzUjvfhhZWMHxNWIvS9wCOnLu4+9nVwFWdPT9N8QLeebzvti /zzQfEI1zlKAiICwbXSwFX989cA5kHUBkBgplChLwLX0yMhiwpSdmopL3DAlwA5Z0PfH P8nPaKzmw9gv9F8cscbwDgDaaA8XaUxdgGl71IZu3OV6Mjt/mdwhlQJPnlPFo+Sfqx4x 4KPQ== X-Received: by 10.112.147.4 with SMTP id tg4mr3212994lbb.121.1450644314980; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 12:45:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:45:13 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Next for me in pcb: tooltips Message-Id: <20151220214513.397e7e267ca0a6a64289b306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > * Is there any way to describe things like the > switch-layers-while-drawing-line-to-magically-add-a-via trick that > people > will actually read? It took me a long time to find out about it and > others > have had the same trouble > > > Britton No I do not find a good way to desribe it. I would say the following would just because describing behaviout is simpler: Change layer and if drawing line also add via. If via is added it is also possible to fail because of enforce DRC clearance or maybe adjust via position while finnishing line. I consider these kind of small details for very common tasks rather important. Nicklas Karlsson