X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=laN9p+LCwl+Xbiu3RNeKOcRa4KDHTTqg0e5PCk1kYPw=;
        b=Lq74LoyvZ5exTCBJhNV7lhNcH29aYe61zD1WMCwYYKzXFjHGBqy3JoYjj/MfKvzizH
         OJ7iRrG1+I2AYzwCpgBpyapgkswAStKNY8TZHJZWub2xc4tA1rkOxou+Q1XKa9OOw4oO
         5r9NafyEnJnCOO4T2nqAOtlqIOJ9AdgYZ9cQcbkXqlJjX+OfWSLlp/o2ge7p+ojFoExC
         z0fk0yJn1dtJxIxkN3nbnSHDlCzRBnVzB5cnyasA+wHfZ4jTw+eFm9mZUkQpedCymoSq
         SWGPEU/k6FP/muS3/sFZ9as2NvTaSP5YNlzT3Nduau4ZZ0brvMRaU+u6tTZbZdmcueLP
         KkcQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.60.82 with SMTP id j79mr21541289vka.43.1449495246333;
 Mon, 07 Dec 2015 05:34:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56658683.401@envinsci.co.uk>
References: <56658683 DOT 401 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:04:06 +0530
Message-ID: <CALT8Ef4=tMf=WmjYmp-2B3rN0SBmoqF5RkCoWZEm=+2hTBTENA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gsch2pcb after refdes-renum?
From: "Shashank Chintalagiri (shashank DOT chintalagiri AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

They won't be updated in place. You'll have to relocate them. More
importantly, if something has it's number changed to a pre-existing
number without a change in footprint, it won't be moved / removed at
all.

Shashank

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Matt Rhys-Roberts
(matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Hello, I'm about to renumber a large amount of schematic components, to
> modify an existing pcb design.
>
> Not got time to experiment, so could anyone please tell me if renumbered
> components are updated in-place, or will they require relocating from the
> stack of revised components that piles up at the origin?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt.



-- 

Chintalagiri Shashank
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

http://blog.chintal.in