X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:41:13 -0500 Message-Id: <201512011841.tB1IfDIJ018459@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20151201124843.GC24702@abax> (message from Martin Beranek on Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:48:43 +0100) Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB: clearouts in polygons slightly off, fix? References: <20151201124843 DOT GC24702 AT abax> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk My personal preference is that, for cases where the output is demonstrably "wrong", we should fix it. In this particular case, we're producing incorrect gerbers (although only *slightly* incorrect, but if you're pushing the limits, that might be enough) and if correcting our mistake causes warnings for others, those are warnings they should have been getting all along anyway ;-) One could argue that by approximating curves with lines we're "wrong" anyway, but then again, since the user has no control over how we do that, a minor tweak in how we do that should still be within our domain.