X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xYlXKJ1WOtf5v+zUJahdQmrA9cy0HRrm4Mq5UyiPvWQ=; b=K4TaVfPN39nC/gduGfT2gvKaqUSbLFgcxeBqAYd9UbcAkbjW1UMaLpbop/83VFpYBp wqcanohX1p/+jdutbWO1Hn6OF5+ANQxoPI6fLjCNuPwbDmqNYVL+nxn7WWIqdGDVPina XeXQXdi2vfZR2cDIF1HewVTRVccpVmXd1QHD7DfaeHz12Mh0W0X5vcGJrCVtPyyHF2Ok j4guYSfRfLXx67kNZ/U5HqwJU21K20aDKPCY13QzqUzuOxoEbOXJEpe4/JZz61Wu+6xh MzIx3Wrr9+7CAjcFj/h8SrfHoy4QiBD/E87D06KPYKMiWnFRrsDM4oaUVUVIqc2mJeYz IfRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.176.36 with SMTP id cf4mr17756575oec.9.1445635922123; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:32:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20151018204010 DOT 9cce6a231dcc296256e187bd AT gmail DOT com> <201510181843 DOT t9IIhmWo025346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151018234424 DOT c0551dad9bef0859130239d9 AT gmail DOT com> <36B94694-F2AC-4A75-A8EB-40A1CE9A534C AT noqsi DOT com> <201510182225 DOT t9IMPkxK032763 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151019003814 DOT f62620bf0fec77e65104c105 AT gmail DOT com> <201510190242 DOT t9J2gl7w009345 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151019092555 DOT 46eed4540c2d2044bbeab878 AT gmail DOT com> <1A419AED-FCCA-4B1F-8589-912435534E2E AT noqsi DOT com> <201510191647 DOT t9JGlu4j024585 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <041FF42A-691F-4E6B-9DEB-8C6B3C2F3E53 AT noqsi DOT com> <201510191850 DOT t9JIop8Y029095 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510192055 DOT t9JKt2o6005861 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1E816300-E31E-4B85-B51D-7EAEC5A466BF AT noqsi DOT com> <201510192110 DOT t9JLAFKG007281 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510192340 DOT t9JNeo6n020302 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1EBD978A-B82E-4DB0-B420-20D3A63D3324 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:32:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Pin mapping (separate symbols from mappings) From: "Carlos Nieves (cnieves DOT mail AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115f3c49cdfb10522cc57a0 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e0115f3c49cdfb10522cc57a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2015-10-23 16:42 GMT+02:00 John Doty : > > It doesn=E2=80=99t depend on footprint names: the approach I=E2=80=99m us= ing for Allegro > looks for a pins=3D attribute, and only tries to deduce pin count from th= e > footprint if that=E2=80=99s absent. Of course, a DRC version might want t= o check > that the footprint matches, if present. > > > Do you have an example? Regards, Carlos --089e0115f3c49cdfb10522cc57a0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-10-23 16:42 GMT+02:00 John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>:

It= doesn=E2=80=99t depend on footprint names: the approach I=E2=80=99m using = for Allegro looks for a pins=3D attribute, and only tries to deduce pin cou= nt from the footprint if that=E2=80=99s absent. Of course, a DRC version mi= ght want to check that the footprint matches, if present.


Do you have an example?

Regards,

Carlo= s
--089e0115f3c49cdfb10522cc57a0--