X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:42:47 -0400
Message-Id: <201510190242.t9J2gl7w009345@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <BED51F9A-F6FF-4A23-B18B-C2EC8BB9DAB6@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:09:11 -0600)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Pin mapping (separate symbols from mappings)
References: <20151018204010 DOT 9cce6a231dcc296256e187bd AT gmail DOT com> <201510181843 DOT t9IIhmWo025346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151018234424 DOT c0551dad9bef0859130239d9 AT gmail DOT com> <36B94694-F2AC-4A75-A8EB-40A1CE9A534C AT noqsi DOT com> <201510182225 DOT t9IMPkxK032763 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151019003814 DOT f62620bf0fec77e65104c105 AT gmail DOT com> <BED51F9A-F6FF-4A23-B18B-C2EC8BB9DAB6 AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> One geda-gaf issue is that the fundamental pin ID is
> refdes/pinnumber, confused a bit by slotting. That would be very
> hard to change, but I think mapping (original refdes)/(original
> pinnumber) to (as-built refdes)/(as-built pinnumber) is possible.

This fails if we switch to symbolic pins, which won't have "original
pinnumber" any more.  Consider:

http://www.delorie.com/pcb/symsym.html

Which gate is "U1/pin-A" ?