X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/D+modh4S3QLvXrcoXJ6QUF/6iTwOWAVtq2z11T6SBQ=; b=xLSqZbraBGSzznkyr27HqNjJ6baTYM/aQmEiOb3DDgzcwK7L7bgpQL6w+8910C9GY0 p0ugJtHip11dqRslh71WGx4c4FUg79KlijIERi/aOJO8TcZPY0aLn+p9mQsVs9R9hY32 texn7vKCOlQO27u6+Rkd7pcA11YXn6hRfX/ehbmKOccWATb9TCvhNZRthjszMEIZ9sx4 QsnxhZYHkB58Ay3u8brWPT+yEz0TzmWlGHEQM5eW5qiTPbJpSnG0Z+5VnlE+uUkJ10uQ eH2lLKdwrpzaIhIioOA/TxJg5f/MJRRtRaOW5aqUOhAfD0LtHyX2C5UXsdzkspC/Qxum qFCg== X-Received: by 10.180.102.169 with SMTP id fp9mr2914546wib.29.1443131856037; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:57:31 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Off topic (UV printer) Message-Id: <20150924235731.03450a730b2ea02f9695dbd9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20150924171517 DOT d86815c2ed405313f5767140 AT gmail DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > I would just Google some terms like < diy dlp photoresist > etc. There are > a lot of homebrewers who have harvested dlp modules from old projector TVs > and are trying to duplicate, or come close to the results of professional > dlp direct printing uv photoresist exposure systems. Although, I must > admit, I haven't come across a successful diy dlp hack in my internet > search. Maybe you're the one to succeed. "professional dlp direct printing uv photoresist exposure systems" I guessed someone else had done before. Now I know I am on the correct track, that's exactly what I was looking for. I will look for something old and keep for the simpler circuits.