X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wfTWkfzvG/i3jQtvNrBiz1d72htXGyoKq6FPVFEYuC8=; b=G6AWcFPw5BcNbWwL3UOwOSLNumcS9uEhAlR2MTOfmxKNRXKDgDDoQuJpQ2IcYpYILh uhNrJdDnzx7uZYWYDab9qFQP4243EN5EolU5kCQgzD6WsX6ogr1Ug/wVwS9hfR0dP1Ed Bw42vmuaXfTbhxFfltZ5XkvSIcXozHS3xotceTlr0dYMnr3gS2UoiyLukCkJ16+VYrGn idXLa/+Pro0ompuR+PNO4KmpyWw98+wssj9e9DDGAhjUdtYy+kGYOehn+UMxCEWzG9/E MD8vG+5FNQPy0BKBMaGrXwEMP+4JAklt8ikWybyAmnSlFQmK0tc6grCAvX7PbgIR78rr MurQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.149.68 with SMTP id ty4mr6225243lbb.74.1442111295635; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:28:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3EEF6816-9EBE-448C-B8EF-49E96C3B95F5@noqsi.com> References: <20150912002643 DOT d476ca384a4a11ddda3b3a52 AT gmail DOT com> <20150912190130 DOT 8e2dbad9f49bd700b19ef422 AT gmail DOT com> <9C33EEB9-0F4C-426E-86D6-AB42B1FB2842 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BCF1504-7F5A-48FF-9C2B-C67645C93609 AT noqsi DOT com> <3EEF6816-9EBE-448C-B8EF-49E96C3B95F5 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 02:28:15 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Netnames on all connected segments From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8D2SL44022472 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 1:38 AM, John Doty wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Evan Foss wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:33 PM, John Doty wrote: >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Nope. It requires a tool that can annotate a schematic. Gschem, as an interactive editor, is not that tool. https://github.com/xcthulhu/lambda-geda is such a tool, and I have used it, but scripting in Haskell is probably not to your liking. >>> >>> You are right about Haskell. >>> >> >> To be more honest I have no real opinion of Haskell having never used >> it. I just don't want to contribute to another fork. > > It’s not a fork, but an independent tool. One that potentially do things that others can’t. I’ve used it to expand a hierarchical design into flat schematics (a lot of them). But even its author is uninterested in further development. Consider it proof of principle for an automated schematic to schematic transformer. There is stuff I would say here but it would 1. Excite the peanut gallery. 2. Take the otherwise positive motion we have now down hill. > It may be that gaf as a Scheme scripting platform can do similar things, but I haven’t looked at it too hard. It seems that Peter Brett has left us with a lot of hidden gems in 1.9. Vladimir is doing a fine job digging them up, but I expect there are more. I’m a little unmotivated to work on scripting for an unreleased version, though. 1.9 needs more bug reports opened and squashed before it is trustworthy. I am doing that now, along with minor support to Igor2 and something for the openocd project. >> As it is I want >> to put some time into pulling stuff from pcb-rnd into the mainline. I >> don't see geda as a competitor to kicad but I want to keep it >> relevant. >> >> -- >> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ >> Work >> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ >> > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/