X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=t9g+IwNa7/13cghI/yh7KBzvck+h7dFe/BB8I624vdw=;
        b=P470+5bTMfUhO+Pq++n7gbuLB4zDopzo2KGk6zl7Vz1bCZydth/z0bI/FvOZMFdpbc
         b5w+GmJH13RvGqdeeQninRZ6jgj5kaKlqudcqqHeLrj03XaFb0eMqj3nzdABKXa6FEV7
         EPOhVLzDS04/HQOpo49co0sDJE8013kp0D7i3kL/ZqUT2JK5UdDLPa4VnlJIAdhuo2uc
         y2NE8P7f2vFRM19kDJU6AdSC2JHZTtuIPntVPR6mUpB8WQqh4zAiph8T1Oi3cO79kGQz
         BZP4+HeHz7WEmx9hBHGO/veX0XpKZdPA78TlRCSMWIE2SNQubI5m7N5O0+RAHsKPr3xM
         Z3HA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.6.41 with SMTP id x9mr3992352lax.120.1442075826947; Sat,
 12 Sep 2015 09:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhThA+ew7eG3O9SDOgv-0u4OJz2kEHD=kM4AMEWA2y_AeQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D3D5A923-FAF9-4665-A0DB-A8D6A8BEA5A3 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CA+uY=MS5ZOTHXDe9taav+0tCiZOqhtAJU2KO-xyRA3SrQVvLNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201509112020 DOT t8BKKBgI012564 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<E872F1BC-8FA7-449E-BA6D-5841AC79A465 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509112058 DOT t8BKwF3b013774 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<6341DF3E-543D-4E36-9B01-6B5B950208C4 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150911230843 DOT GE7946 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20150912021841 DOT 52f57f2d AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55F3F5F2 DOT 406 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<DF372225-A570-4A5C-B80E-B917FE60B594 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150912142006 DOT GA16820 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAM2RGhThA+ew7eG3O9SDOgv-0u4OJz2kEHD=kM4AMEWA2y_AeQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:37:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhRRv847bHCVQyqf0C0k8t83PJpicjSHGkq3LxCUyF5erw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] About reinventing the wheel, and how to avoid it
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8CGbB90020308
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
> [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:03:41AM -0600, John Doty wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:52 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via
>>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > You don't think John would stay away from a
>>> > list dedicated to pcb, do you?
>>>
>>> Actually, I would. If we treated geda-gaf and pcb as separate
>>> developments that can interoperate, I’d be much happier. To me, the
>>> relationship of the ngspice development with geda-gaf is much
>>> healthier than the relationship of pcb development with geda-gaf.
>>>
>

The flow from gschem to ngspice is one of a number of options there is
also gnucap, xyce and etc. The flows to and from pcb are not as
diverse there is really only one schematic capture program that can
flow into it. Solving the back annotation issue (which is seeing some
serious progress) will I hope resolve this.

<snip>
>
>
> --
> Home
> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
> Work
> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/