X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a9HOUwGSh9zSejGD9AZoNukCyErBl9Fkui69DL7egfc=; b=W5xilpAX+XdrhRGwZiNY9RPGKlEeIonzwVcAsp85Z4D7HQn53B2tukd2cie29v336M 37ohF1qOxF7tNxlDCPclWJ246kReL4oUaV9COp6iQ3o0to3D4KCqlndCU++tVyNpFO8R Rl2s76KJ29p8d8TqEItaYSbLX/dmikMliWQX31PdfNp8EUAr0y3r7N1McVAyI3MUugef StdL9q25dXFSune7QFhaZ+5Wm2mhF1tUIu4Xy0BAOz/eKH/4bWVn4g16ahhOqW9FpvsM RzWchw7CED9Ya+tT2P2XDO4HHw5GSjTKA+DXfnO3H8WK5kpq3GjrEyiSlKB/hBFkeuwe GUuw== X-Received: by 10.180.84.99 with SMTP id x3mr5973416wiy.16.1442058662973; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 04:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:50:56 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] shortest way towards parsing .pcb files outside pcb Message-Id: <20150912135056.ac8c660f47e01b6a89c40e08@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150912124632.3347c70a@jive.levalinux.org> References: <55F3FD8F DOT 4090709 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150912124632 DOT 3347c70a AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:46:32 +0200 "Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:25:19 +0200 > "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" > wrote: > > > A more worthwhile goal might be to /replace/ pcbs current storage and > > storage handling. > > Yes, this is what I/we try to achieve. My roadmap is this: > > 1. Define the new data structure. > > This is what I'm doing nowadays. > > 2. Write importer/exporter to the new data structure for the current PCB. > > This will allow us doing tests on the new data structure. Strictly speaking > with the existing PCB, we can fiddle only with the subset of the new data > structure. > > 3. Rewrite PCBs internal data structures and data handling. > > 4. Modify the HIDs to deal with the new data structure. > > Does this sound reasonable? > > I'm sorry that I'm slow. I have so many personal/dayjob tasks. > > However, I'm on halfway to convince one of my college to work on pcb. > > Thanks, > Lev > > -- > 73 de HA5OGL > Op.: Levente > Did you put into any branch?