X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 19:17:13 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] back annotation - phase 2, call for contributors In-Reply-To: <201509011657.t81Gve9d017777@envy.delorie.com> Message-ID: References: <55E5A6BA DOT 4030606 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509011657 DOT t81Gve9d017777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Do you want write access to the public repo? There you can commit to >> a branch and stuff will be visible and easily pickable. >> >> To the other gEDA comitters: I hope you don't mind me offering this. > > I encourage folks to use the gedaproject repo unless there's a > compelling reason not to. > For me, the important quesiton is whether the changes put in such a branch gets into the next release - or is left in a feature branch to bit rot. So what do you, gschem maintainers, think about the gschem-related points of my proposal? Regards, Igor2