X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=IX8A7OSPlzVKY/2PIKfrX1hX82pfnb2udEO3iPhIDZk=;
        b=tGjM74CWqRkwos+phECHv89yJpb6HvKoSdmFXlQpaJ8yzAA4/Mgg7mnkHewLzq6Ao1
         SxnHZwKN6BlilA/ICMcMOlG74c2vc1G1Ssv0+c7+SodlyG8LUPf8hfJ6PN41qnSx+ebP
         2TsgHgeMl4xcbjkOKkeEReRmrCTAndgETSkFLcAlx/CqImrwksqPDZdsJFhKYypIsEX1
         hLO/ttmQZp/dYsD0DY07uqJfZv2WbBygyfaO/y6S3YsONr/zMqsLQVij5Jg+UPoxHpYr
         JefRvWwvgFgdIazz1E+aUW10xdBx6P7uHneCxxwSItxyt6EZxTcqBZDT0/LSx03PKTql
         0jmw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.159.226 with SMTP id xf2mr16546176lbb.74.1440362208944;
 Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55DA2B4B.1010104@iae.nl>
References: <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<55D9BB90 DOT 5020708 AT iae DOT nl>
	<201508231651 DOT t7NGpEVt030026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55DA2B4B DOT 1010104 AT iae DOT nl>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:36:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhSNTJcvDKO8RCFmRQDM8X8Goee8yu7-YryEbLt=5-WKUg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Antifork
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:21 PM, myken <myken AT iae DOT nl> wrote:
>>>> There's probably nothing wrong with that, but if that's the case, I
>>>> find it natural that developers find it more motivating to develope
>>>> for themselves than for the "crowd" - at least, that's the effect on me.
>>>
>>> And this will be the dead of pcb.
>>
>> All the pcb developers have made it clear that they work on pcb for
>> selfish reasons, this is nothing new.  I wish more users were
>> motivated to work on it for selfish reasons.
>
>
> Absolutely! But if "working for me" automatically means "not working
> together" I think any project will die.

Seconded with die substituted for slowed down.

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/