X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:48:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB and gschem libraries
In-Reply-To: <CA+uY=MSNf7NbVntf++G5ne3-33ihwvkEjZH7tot0S2SLjfO6cg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1504021945130.25799@igor2priv>
References: <1427905808 DOT 32608 DOT 60 DOT camel AT benjamin-hp-g70> <20150401214846 DOT 5d2261e6 AT jive> <201504011954 DOT t31JsnKh020289 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150401221210 DOT 1b4a299e AT jive> <201504012014 DOT t31KEq1m020861 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <551C574F DOT 2030708 AT xs4all DOT nl>
 <CA+uY=MTgd=aS-vyUE8RHcHZr+dJjtBe_h4yAFANPi6VBPUPVhQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504020454050 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv> <CA+uY=MT=Td=0VMgHfRcQtuYYTx7v8YVNCmFPn353Liki9QTTSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504021718120 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv>
 <CA+uY=MQyuhrSuWSu0Z8FHFX3B9TYr13cxLWgxOysar-yyZ6y8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504021812560 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv> <CA+uY=MSNf7NbVntf++G5ne3-33ihwvkEjZH7tot0S2SLjfO6cg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Russell Nelson wrote:

>Anarchy doesn't mean chaos. It means *voluntary* organization. Encouraging
>chaos because you dislike hierarchy is simply the wrong way to go about it.

I do not encourage chaos. I encourage the free choice of users that leads 
to a variety of available solutions. This has better chance to yield 
solutions that a random new user finds good than if you stick to a 
centrally organized One Good Solution.

Anyway, if you are so much for centralization, I invite you to join my 
library effort (following the rules I set) and my free software 
development efforts (following my rules there too, working on projects 
that I find interesting).

Regards,

Igor2