X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=A8gkOqiyTSftipZqCj5YBY5DnLlVMj5IPE66oYU3gv8=; b=UwKc4WyyiGWB7XmxtoTqEOQAh+LWYHpVZt5e0a3/+MrJ03wWU1TE1xGjPKoUby8Gg2 Va9vj1hG8iV58ee8x3ikv+1lQFz+iRqXoeXR2pCSY1TUE/F7GacRKxn6ke/z8HOEAXX4 SM4ohsYySNVXvc1bmH7xadKLj8fnBL75TJX0kB4rZllpbJRRgiA2eZkdQsmQvHEF4woR 30tUZskbc4t/qZetFDqeicmaFOEodEpmniE8nEWrFiMq6hQxXps/VtlxOMrPzJOzwQNc WlHum6M4PHfAhnAhtbWowlx2Md2mcbd3iPhXYcoaEkAeNZeC60Tf+GsmZAzQ5wJKgjLJ xsRg== X-Received: by 10.194.60.77 with SMTP id f13mr154252439wjr.105.1426771155911; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 06:19:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Filippo Micheletti Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:18:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Structured footprint library To: MAILING LIST gEDA-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86db8aec8bc40511a40b5e Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7b86db8aec8bc40511a40b5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Using propertary services like Google ones it's not exactely free-software compliant... anyway I agree with the desire to create a new, well structured footprint library, maybe with a more easy-to-use access than a cvs based one, but unfortunaltely I have no suggestions. - Filippo - On 19 March 2015 at 13:52, Bernhard Kraft wrote: > Hi, > > Some idea which came out of the long "pcb alternatives" thread was to > create a structured footprint library as alternative to the existing > newlib, pcblib, pcb-newlib libraries. > > As a first step I would suggest we define the directory structure to > be used. Instead of starting this directly in some cvs/svn/git, and as > it is NOT POSSIBLE to create empty directories in git (major fail! :) > I would suggest we create this structure at some online shared editing > facility. > > Suggestions: > * Google docs > * www.codeshare.io > > Other suggestions? Someone complained about sites making heavy use of > JS. I hope either one of above suggestions is suitable for your > system. > > > greetings, > Bernhard > --047d7b86db8aec8bc40511a40b5e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Using propertary services like Google ones it's not ex= actely free-software compliant...
anyway I agree with the desire to cre= ate a new, well structured footprint library, maybe with a more easy-to-use= access than a cvs based one, but unfortunaltely I have no suggestions.


- Filippo -

On 19 March 2015 at 13:52, Bernhard Kraft <bkraf0j9 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
Hi,

Some idea which came out of the long "pcb alternatives" thread wa= s to
create a structured footprint library as alternative to the existing
newlib, pcblib, pcb-newlib libraries.

As a first step I would suggest we define the directory structure to
be used. Instead of starting this directly in some cvs/svn/git, and as
it is NOT POSSIBLE to create empty directories in git (major fail! :)
I would suggest we create this structure at some online shared editing
facility.

Suggestions:
=C2=A0 * Google docs
=C2=A0 * www.codeshar= e.io

Other suggestions? Someone complained about sites making heavy use of
JS. I hope either one of above suggestions is suitable for your
system.


greetings,
Bernhard

--047d7b86db8aec8bc40511a40b5e--