X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:00:59 -0400 Message-Id: <201403181700.s2IH0xT8011193@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20140318121157.GB24197@localhost.localdomain> (message from Vladimir Zhbanov on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:11:57 +0400) Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb-20140316 is released References: <201403170355 DOT s2H3tavv007601 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <532741F8 DOT 8090101 AT buffalo DOT edu> <201403171845 DOT s2HIj1kj012076 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20140317185419 DOT GB5081 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201403171856 DOT s2HIuDTJ012716 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20140317191258 DOT GC5081 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201403171921 DOT s2HJLmgp014261 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20140318121157 DOT GB24197 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Seriously, what changes do you consider important enough to bump > the version? Will mil->um changes do? As for me, the versioning scheme > major.minor would be better and would allow to make minor fixes into > distributions more quickly. Probably major changes to how the user interacts with the tools. We did major.minor until 1.99z :-)