X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <1394054687.2135.37.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem attributes only for symbols pins and nets?
From: Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:24:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20140305204935.3BAF9807ABF5@turkos.aspodata.se>
References: <1393977186 DOT 2845 DOT 14 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	 <20140305115559 DOT 5F2ED807ABF4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	 <1394048274 DOT 2135 DOT 34 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	 <20140305204935 DOT 3BAF9807ABF5 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 21:49 +0100, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
> > For the attribute coordinates, I still ask myself if I should
> display
> > absolute or relative coordinates (relative to symbol origin).
> ...
> 
> I'd vote for relative, I really think the fileformat should be
> changed 
> to to.

Yes, I also prefer relative coordinates for display.
Of course displayed coordinates are not strongly related to coordinates
in files, so file format needs no changes.