X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=laJZSgJZdSollGfyzjA9jewTzGE4jmnknLU/7+mmXko=; b=e/2b1mxowkozqFnPSesZsnVR4D4b/cNwk3qPIox2FclkGxzsquPRV1/oh75x9a9dcH 2Q9VrJCFLZ4EFm8M81Qik++GUFacl7mKX+IxpTZBxYj1JT4SoHIVOPCPjx0Nqp25vmkk aiBYTdweKAwVh+kQeEpt+AiPSv8hyQuHZ4UT4GHqcDom9bw3kqz6r6Nl9rbBjXwttdUp LAy0J/zXezXrAhYiDO7o+082Ld5riNRY4Nz/fbl4/gmIIaCmAvPZX64Eou25dOuGIeor JLiBmokripVvTJz2whL+mkoGDsgyr34S9qFQ2ri2qIpS3fph+yZ9i0KxOb9I3WIEinQi mMLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.95.233 with SMTP id dn9mr10203800vdb.3.1393531281561; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:01:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:01:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [geda-user] Via under a pad? From: Rob Butts To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136b6100560de04f368c906 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com --001a1136b6100560de04f368c906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is it bad practice to put vias under pads? These pads are twice as big as the vias. Just curious. --001a1136b6100560de04f368c906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is it bad practice to put vias under pads?=A0 These p= ads are twice as big as the vias.

Just curious.
--001a1136b6100560de04f368c906--