X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=8B0SYfeW+PaGMPvYEiG+i2oXxXcQf3i5C/BxKtBoOfU=;
        b=cpp2GX7t6C4+E/Wr/T4c+Ps+eHAmuEFPWPS5rP2KML4GJU3ymv/dhopXMNtFJolGIH
         +q6+YYUC8Qnc3qiUALqVhYJY1bOBoOs1F/ty6HQe/i0di2mv+F03SvQCWvfotpTkutbs
         oWR+obiqs7f4tGqYDiffAHqfMxBUa5JAHtjg/ae0+ffRYuy/0vcaIJwWEn0NqlxJIqBJ
         i93z/VlpCWRlhpXRSf62zuVsgxVL3OMuK/z/FS23eh34m1W7yxj/XkVv04VlR+2sddHe
         XL1i9rdlKuR/feIXAWHczb2ye2sczza+C+c4Q+v1DE8l1Xaf3DF825wNSYyC27zyt0+J
         mxew==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.170 with SMTP id x10mr18303076igl.20.1392665948833;
 Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:39:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADefDOFZpsbx909CVRp91AQwKq5+FjvhCacdKtGj5uh-QwyWPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADefDOFZpsbx909CVRp91AQwKq5+FjvhCacdKtGj5uh-QwyWPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:39:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CADefDOELPMgSbcQiPqomjB5y27WtJuPwFLGS=QACcHh2mUVBaw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [geda-user] Re: gEDA as alternative for KiCad (for me)?
From: Michai Ramakers <m DOT ramakers AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

thank you for the comments btw; I appreciate it.

The obvious thing with things like EDA suites is that one picks one,
then invests time and grows a library and gets to know the workflow;
it's difficult and cumbersome to change to something else. That's why
hands-on experience from people actually using it is important, at
least to me.

Michai