X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=qqeThRlGGM2bRmbNPCuVYbrANN6gtfunAi2qdRw3a6M=; b=kpcPjaecefveajjxtOaw/WSPJTiT6E3bGQTDZGoboAU0NVL8rKfJdzRnVc71TcOcoJ rSAtvsETlbH5ECaKa2Wkkp5HoQgWpUF5+b5s35EOK3BCzZOj/DjKJqjMGO89HtQUd6KZ zSq2bfbjiTLwLgVetwy8C8DeDf2uf/k2vTEbO4XwIAl72EYoYymXYQhMzKBzorUGwnIj sk1AhA7UC5/i7vbiEu0W1p6oyUW+v7r47xpNht43OenwX0a1BVC0bW3DCC4RjAsP/G/d adqhrsVs2GPwT797I1C37ah9yZuS52sXxCfwfX2lceRBpsTLpG4kpqc75XAuWhPTf3Jx 7B1A== X-Received: by 10.152.170.168 with SMTP id an8mr6207076lac.39.1389685192874; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:39:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:39:50 +0400 From: Vladimir Zhbanov To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: pcb-1.99z.pt_BR.po Message-ID: <20140114073950.GC23401@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20131228191702 DOT GA8259 AT papai DOT Home> <20140104212722 DOT GB27890 AT papai DOT Home> <20140111082212 DOT GB3281 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20140111105310 DOT GA3164 AT papai> <52D12B71 DOT 7000503 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20140112184537 DOT GA4678 AT papai> <20140112194310 DOT GA14137 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20140113082032 DOT GA2667 AT papai> <20140113102956 DOT GA4846 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20140114051024 DOT GA1166 AT papai DOT Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140114051024.GA1166@papai.Home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:10:24AM -0200, Jorge Barros de Abreu wrote: > Seems to me that what i make was a "hack". > I do not know to transform my hack in a patch. > This situation have new files that need to be named. > Is suitable gpcb-menu.res.in.pt_BR ou gpcb-menu.pt_BR.res.in??? > The proposed file is the first. > > At this moment i discovery a file named pcb-menu.res.in that was not > translated and this mensage need to be stoped for translate it. IIUC, you have to work only in the po/ directory. See the files lying there, for instance nl.po or ru.po. As of now, there is a bug related to menu internationalization. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/1113758 You can try to apply the patch provided there.