X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=wVGLqP7SyPN86+Cb/WY6W3jrQEYm34JwucaEKwdKHUc=; b=S9u6eU0mBoupwIy7bK7yVZacFwsi+5QQA9qTuizeOKqnzwjngaxG0h5NMXV2BVpQ3+ OjmfVTPGlb/SXuJrLf1eCnbBqBtl4tMboWzT6t1HwqExgI4R3mXL1/Gwdl9qY5RThhez B7Iwa2uxrpXmOHjNwxArBPi9d/ZOKwHY22j2Jme1+41oRBGPVjaRyCPTzNrI0YPJAWF1 6qhWCIG1sPUVN8EXukof2cyI8UEfDSbNAIVH8X1Di1sutIXpKX73kZI2kS+osg14SkJ3 hZ+Lw4kQlgzBha6AWhn/ICkYetuh2CaI7h8VPIFyatHwKxmCOjPhvqcOYKiyjGE30XHY 8acg== X-Received: by 10.152.2.5 with SMTP id 5mr5437931laq.21.1389427003518; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:56:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:56:39 +0400 From: Vladimir Zhbanov To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] 4-pin SPST microswitch Message-ID: <20140111075639.GA3281@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20140110201835 DOT GW20344 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <20140110220844 DOT GZ20344 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1389393738 DOT 2083 DOT 33 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <20140110230643 DOT GA7128 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140110230643.GA7128@fi.muni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:06:43AM +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote: ... > Why not connecting them? I would like to use the in-microswitch > connection between pins 1 and 2 and between pins 3 and 4 as an "additional > PCB layer". I.e. I need the space between those pins for other traces. Why not just add "an additional PCB layer", connect the pins there, and then make the layer invisible for further routing?