X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1389393738.2083.33.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> Subject: Re: [geda-user] 4-pin SPST microswitch From: Stefan Salewski To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:42:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140110220844.GZ20344@fi.muni.cz> References: <20140110201835 DOT GW20344 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <20140110220844 DOT GZ20344 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 23:08 +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote: > Hello, > > Jason White wrote: > : Just a hunch, try making a footprint with multiple "1" and "2" pins > : that correlate to the schematic symbol. > > This almost works, thanks! I have modified TYCO_FSMJSM.fp to have > two pins named and numbered "1", and two pins named and numbered "2". > The resulting .pcb and .net files do almost what I want - pcb considers > both pins in a given pair to be part of the same net. Good. > > The problem is, that it still requires the pins in a pair to be connected > with a PCB trace (it displays a rat line connecting pins 1 and 2, > and another connecting pins 3 and 4). > > How can I fix that? Thanks, > > -Yenya > Have you tried using an empty string for pin names 2 and 4 in your modified footprint file? I can not remember if I have ever done that -- I guess it may work. But why not connecting the pads? Draw a trace, or make an additional (thin) pad in the footprint connecting the pads.