X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <1379350163.574.19.camel@pcjc2lap> Subject: Re: [geda-user] request for clarification: via names vs pin names (pcb) From: Peter Clifton To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:49:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5236C3E1.2060806@envinsci.co.uk> References: <5236BA86 DOT 2070306 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <201309160814 DOT r8G8EONW004255 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <5236C3E1 DOT 2060806 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 09:40 +0100, Matt Rhys-Roberts wrote: > On 16/09/13 09:14, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I can see the use of editing the pin and pad names, but what is the use > >> of editing the via and line names? > > So when you're creating a footprint you can give pins and pads names > > before you merge them into the footprint. > > Thanks, I see that it works, but why would it be useful to name pin 1 of > a component differently from its pad or hole? Sorry if I'm not seeing > the obvious yet. :) If you execute the .cmd file produced by gsch2pcb, the pin names are renamed to match the net-list. I just searched for an example in one of my designs where it did not match, and have: # Start of element U18 ChangePinName(U18, 8, Ref B) ChangePinName(U18, 10, Sense B) ChangePinName(U18, 9, Out B) ChangePinName(U18, 5, + In B) ChangePinName(U18, 6, - In B) ChangePinName(U18, 14, Ref A) ChangePinName(U18, 12, Sense A) ChangePinName(U18, 4, V-) ChangePinName(U18, 11, V+) ChangePinName(U18, 13, Out A) ChangePinName(U18, 3, + In A) ChangePinName(U18, 2, - In A) When I hit the short-cut to show the pin-out ("d"), on that chip, I get the descriptive names assigned to the pins. The on-hover tool-tip still shows the foot-print assigned name, as does the net-list. Whether or not you see the pin numbers, of the descriptive names can be toggled from the View menu. (View->"Enable Pinout shows number"). Perhaps not the most obvious feature in the world? Regards, -- Peter Clifton Clifton Electronics