X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <522F4D12.9060303@sonic.net> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:47:14 -0700 From: Dave Curtis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB: why does pin name lettering appear on top & bottom copper Gerber output? References: <522EF85C DOT 1000206 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <201309101628 DOT r8AGSkcs017932 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> In-Reply-To: <201309101628.r8AGSkcs017932@envy.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 09/10/2013 09:28 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: >> AFAIK this is a feature, not a bug. > I think it's more of a bug, but one that's hard to fix with the HID > api we have now. What we need is CAM jobs that describe which drawing > layers become which output layers, so that things that make sense in a > PDF but don't make sense in a gerber, can be properly filtered. > > What we actually have is a single "gui vs not-gui" flag that mostly > works but is very simple, so the user needs to be aware which parts of > the design are WYSIWYG and what parts are GUI-only. Perhaps we should > change pin names to be gui-only to avoid costly problems (and yes, I > know no change will be universally liked ;) > > FYI: generating gerbers in a Makefile is much more reliable anyway :-) > Would it be a huge deal to simply put pin numbers on their own layer? Named something like: "notes-do-not-fab.gbr"?