X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+9xq8QsK7XwE4xhtv+cARx4e6xpEkRZNML6JPsDzoQM=; b=OHKCgqXZ7wG4+dCvgeCW8Na1YXCfx0FbH3XWU8IFrzi7v7/E3s708ZywrrTIftb3oJ 28oEzM3B1fHEFyYo8zj3YuZlff9Mhb8vCyMCbOU2ALc/mbXzQgpmDtqpNomCYRokGl64 MP+mQglSloj63c1mVd2RnUWI/mlig4ZhSEFeydfoCV1uAZz+jp/Z4LHKNr8kjWoh0oD3 6UjuMpE5fSIcynrluxAsMwNGLLX9+wE7Wwyd5V2CWI4jQ4iE9+rwipMH3CPjoTwpasCJ on25jAfLJkm76wAyIe2lgay/Ec8Kg6gH5ZlsAHbQyWwU7hq2C6bRTsfFHLIpAvWA5fYi LVqg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlc/e9bDRyx/9BuCSemCImggi+8x4KOckFV/bYMJXdaq9XUdhahWYL+Bks7XRv7oip+gp8L MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.22.198 with SMTP id g6mr8695044laf.5.1376855924749; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:58:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [92.235.51.46] In-Reply-To: <1376774043.3434.8.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> References: <520F9550 DOT 5030700 AT iae DOT nl> <1376774043 DOT 3434 DOT 8 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:58:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Dead link in the wiki pages. From: Gareth Edwards To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 17 August 2013 22:14, Stefan Salewski wrote: > > Dead from http://www.gpleda.org/ > That's not a gEDA page, that's Ales's page. He's the only person who can fix those I think. > But of course that is not only a geda problem -- simple minded people > pollute the net with redundant information when they have too much free > time -- and later the do not care... I'm sure the links will have been provided in good faith and were live at the time. Calling someone "simple minded" for not being able to maintain links is more than a little harsh in my opinion.