X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20121215005100.25129.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:51:00 +0100
From: Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <A7B4EDBD-3704-4837-9350-A16559C60A2A AT noqsi DOT com> <201212140010 DOT qBE0ABjV023762 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <172CCAAB-0423-43EF-8A04-5A9961F1D5B9 AT noqsi DOT com> <201212140122 DOT qBE1MoKM019255 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <5AA18F19-2EA9-4E7D-9378-F768D8E1E5DD AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212140501300 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <50CB5D82 DOT 8060507 AT jump-ing DOT de> <E5DE4486-B23F-4945-943A-F46C6E308B90 AT noqsi DOT com> <50CBA1B8 DOT 9050706 AT jump-ing DOT de> <E796F1EA-BD3E-4EC9-A852-CFE8D156CA62 AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E796F1EA-BD3E-4EC9-A852-CFE8D156CA62@noqsi.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

John Doty wrote:
> DJ has complained that the "first touch" heuristic for identifying
> connectivity is seriously leaky in complicated cases.

Is first touch really a good idea?

Intuitively I would expect tags to be copied (I prefer not to say
inherited, because that implies hierarchy, which does not exist) to a
new line *only* if I start or end that line on another object which
already has a tag.

I think floating object should not (can not?) have tags by default.


//Peter