X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com Message-ID: <508ECB94.2020006@neurotica.com> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:31:48 -0400 From: Dave McGuire User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: Pin hole size) References: <20121028164801 DOT GA4859 AT alpha2> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de> <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de> <5FF7010F-BB82-41F2-8EBC-608E91E045F1 AT noqsi DOT com> <71Y DOT Jn6g DOT QcLTSHBZJi DOT 1GZPiP AT seznam DOT cz> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 10/29/2012 06:42 AM, John Doty wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2012, at 8:47 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > >> John D. will be quick to point out other work-flows and that he >> actually uses some. These arguments tend to pop up time and again. I >> did a poll on geda-user some time ago. It was probably 2010 or 2009. >> You can look it up in the archive. (gmane archive, that is). >> Results were not very surprising: Almost everybody does gschem->pcb. >> Some also do some other work-flows. IIRC somebody even reported to >> start with pcb without bothering with gschem in the first place. > > 1. Popularity doesn't measure power. TeX isn't popular, but it sure is powerful. I'd say TeX is pretty popular. The drooling masses don't use it, but who cares? -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA