X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <50897B77.1030401@laserlinc.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:48:39 -0400
From: Joshua Lansford <Joshua DOT Lansford AT laserlinc DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
 Pin hole size)
References: <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50892DC8 DOT 6080308 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201210251629 DOT q9PGTfes029100 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <201210251629.q9PGTfes029100@envy.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com


On 10/25/2012 12:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> If you're going to put in all that effort, please put it into the main
> wiki/repo.  Why have two?
>
That would be fine.  It would be nice to have an open place to 
document/log gEDA related items. Valuable material can be distilled out 
of it.  Perhaps a separate wiki.  Folks could post about patches which 
are not universally applicable.  It could be a place to catch scripts.  
Peer evaluation could highlight useful scripts and correct their 
documentation.  More people may consider themselves noobs to this forum 
then not and probably be more comfortable sharing their work and 
corrections  this way.  I suppose that is 4 cents now.  I'm almost all 
the way to a nickle.