X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=cE8O8Ay1Zt2Ei92Q5Eor/lvblhFYNslOGLsMN99ebY8=;
        b=xFavytDJA7QNoqgiOvte0zY08K66frqugSQh0PncjBZ/6Hqhh8szNvbaK8NBxml1fq
         HTeGu8txOQUAPBBHWMkNc/BEnVIw97UXaskA5yZFY04yfM0LMmd6lYbC1z7BYeIv7r2X
         QQ3VwcODA+K4VoE0iPrekxQMMvotU3TC3nxecZxtMgF6E3wc2JKE/ZYaeppV7UQrdCc5
         AJCCwC89uatzLs0l8+vHjvkYwdRz+YLLwUfCJUH9r3Lyn6TAayOtD6lNEfIYXvxlNjbH
         A+yebZ3g/OzUvMRE8Ne6Xl/NvSpBRwFue4j641nmGHdOQ3t13ckl5RzCvuCRFru1nChn
         v3rQ==
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:10:12 +0400
From: Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user]
Message-ID: <20120817161012.GA28947@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CACPio-6k5KWuEeHhn=1r8mxYb2HRpXzC5DrTWSaqDxufw7u2YQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <k0jl2k$ibn$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
 <CACPio-4unK57Re-HUn_yyhBTt-P-Fph5B0cmVnE6gBzYnXUyww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACPio-4unK57Re-HUn_yyhBTt-P-Fph5B0cmVnE6gBzYnXUyww@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:05:54AM -0400, Nathan Stewart wrote:
> Not sure if the list will take attachments but I stripped it down,
> took everything extraneous out, except a trivial subcircuit, and
> included the verbose netlist output.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak
> <knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
> > Nathan Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> My hierarchical schematic is having fits with the netlister, giving the
> >> error: Missing I/O symbol with refdes [HPF_I1] inside schematic for
> >> symbol [S2]

I tried your schematic and found that it gives another error:
  Missing I/O symbol with refdes [HPF_O2] inside schematic for symbol [S1]
  Missing I/O symbol with refdes [HPF_I2] inside schematic for symbol [S1]
As you can see gnetlist shows other refdeses in the error message. Try
to change pinlabels in your hpf-channel-a.sym to HPF_O1 and HPF_I1, they
should correspond to refdeses of your input and output symbols
(in-1.sym, out-1.sym) in your sub-schematic.


-- 
VZh
http://vzhbanov.byethost33.com