X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:48:55 +0100
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] BUG: disappearing dots in gschem
Message-ID: <20120119104855.GA9434@visitor2.iram.es>
References: <20120118090450 DOT GB28925 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
 <20120118093353 DOT 10720 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
 <CAJisMU2b9O5pq3KTTbAMYdy8ZnkQh6m0kC3rwU1AjfrR7uL-Kw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <20120118105942 DOT GA10816 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
 <CAJisMU0RF-6LPTZhCtuF_GFO-J=fkqtQUTFuV3z78N-M7iXbow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJisMU0RF-6LPTZhCtuF_GFO-J=fkqtQUTFuV3z78N-M7iXbow@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q0JAn4eM002342
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:41:47AM +0100, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 18 stycznia 2012 11:59 użytkownik Gabriel Paubert
> <paubert AT iram DOT es> napisał:
> 
> > Correct. The dots only seem to appear in the middle of segments, but
> > not when you have a mix of pins and net segments. And, as far as I remember
> > there was never a dot when three pins coincide, which may happen fairly
> > frequently in passive circuits as shown in the new attachments; these do
> > not cover all the cases, since up to 4 pins/segments may coincide easily,
> > and more if you use non horizontal/vertical net segments or, shudder, pins.
> 
> The fix for the issue is now in git HEAD. I have also fixed the case
> of junction dots on connections where only pins are involved without
> net segments.

Thank you very much. As far as I know, junction dots are now drawn in
a consistent way. 

I also see that you have added quite a few comments to the code. Good!

	Regards,
	Gabriel