X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 01:07:08 +0200 From: "Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] Thank you verry much, next Idea - IPC proof Message-ID: <20170529010708.29be8939@debian> In-Reply-To: References: <20170515111111 DOT 1ba62f47 AT debian> <20170516163211 DOT 2d920db6 AT debian> Organization: Individuum auf blauem Planet X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk That is great. I can not belief this. Thank you very much. The next idea follows as soon as possible. (: In Example: I finde a rule fore footprint construction. http://www.kemet.com/Lists/TechnicalArticles/Attachments/29/f2100e.pdf This Documentation is according to the IPC-SM-782. And KEMET make this IPC-rule easy to understand, i think. We can now take this Information and make gEDA more perfect. We can add some SMD-Footprints to the standard library in accordance to the IPC. I think, this is a important feature to make pcb more seriously. I have an Idea, but this is not easy. We can innovate a new attribute in xgschem "IPC-SMT-782A-Kemet_l=length_mm/mil", "IPC-SMT-782A-Kemet_w=with_mm/mil", "IPC-SMT-782A-Kemet_h=height_mm/mil", "Make-Footprint=1". More Easy is the use of a script "IPC-SMT-782A l w h mm/mil" to generate fp-files. And more Easy is the including of some standard footprints "IPC0603", "IPC0805","IPC2220".... What you think about. Am Sun, 28 May 2017 13:26:43 -0400 schrieb "Chad Parker (parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" : > This is now implemented in the git master branch. The outline will be > added to the assembly layers. > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via > geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > The outline in assembly-page are a requested from assembly producer. > > Because she need to get a bether orientation in the layout. > > > > > > Am Mon, 15 May 2017 19:50:25 -0400 > > schrieb "Chad Parker (parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com) [via > > geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" : > > > > > Hi- > > > > > > Presently, the behavior of pcb (when the referenced option is > > > set) is to include the contents of the "outline" layer on all > > > copper layers in the output. If the outline layer is empty, then > > > the rectangle defining the working area is included instead (this > > > rectangle is defined in the preferences dialogue). > > > > > > The outline is not included on non-copper layers, including silk, > > > solder mask, solder paste, etc. Are you requesting that the > > > outline be included on these layers as well? Or are you not > > > seeing the outline on copper layers? > > > > > > --Chad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via > > > geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > > > > > Hallo guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > pcb->export->ps > > > > > > > > has a nice option: > > > > "outline" > > > > > > > > The help-text says: > > > > print outline to each sheet > > > > > > > > The option is very usefull, because the outline is also > > > > important for assembly. > > > > > > > > The problem ist, the outline turns up only in top+bottom. > > > > > > > > Is this so intended? > > > > It seems to me not perfect. > > > > > > > > > > > > greeting > > > > > > > >