X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IvjSPvoRXMzWTCTRe4eNnVz98R16c23c4/sjxJxJgZI=; b=ZQA6meLEVMlIvoxdHUANbUCvQRWObnDHeVLPxBGPBGEXeXvKYvouhL4GhAEZdvcBYQ 7kvmpAqsOQCsob9OYAcJl7hpqERpUEbQKbb6+ZfdJEy0z/2fK5VdSJgBAqrN0F7bnTo5 kMRCx/yHD7Ut6EJ6UcoMBu7l9PB+h+FyJ89/7uvT6Yba44IEcC8kEuNJj8dA/K0q31qz P//A++AEh+ruViEnkorcOrifCgNxL7SdfpjXs/ofboYBFnkDWm2N/0ETrTX1AziUR7/F EZ0TrGzuRF4j40TfdnkL056Nqsh0pVmMZMKvCjiHntzEJ4JwIqNTkELAqZPl42/9D/i+ p40A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IvjSPvoRXMzWTCTRe4eNnVz98R16c23c4/sjxJxJgZI=; b=TotNXme/xVAw4kafYam3GLORiqNdB+imHb4Au8/Rnn/EY/zapmShO4QdOeAryw1xXJ lF+aXhXa3NUuZtmfHeryb9KHjNbBUv4Ik7cc2bPLo/G1GHeKth7dpDr7CqA8QohdPOpj Y3EeiJVtlqCNV2J42+MQV1S2KKEjaKN8nbYJRnVPi2GbbpVsNX/ftK3epgxAtDmAqHEY HUhhPveRfA5ib1MuFWDFTQy4xtoHS4Xu+rnV07w8XhBjiLbZ5oMoaoDjEWfpygBIomB6 DawS/jxrP901r0p776cyDQBoPv4Hi0l6STAND7rGBWUZTwurMHDujRUjzObN0bGNiSS/ AD1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kDvcP01nr2+pEGqOLffjrB6udx2fNG7E02uT3AmXYVunIVR33FSMyIixX760vTbQ== X-Received: by 10.25.166.131 with SMTP id p125mr3280078lfe.142.1487440954957; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:02:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:02:32 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] Please help with multiple-pages schematics Message-ID: <20170218180232.GB23464@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com References: <11BDEC14-5D1D-4157-B552-582C1E75D00E AT noqsi DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <11BDEC14-5D1D-4157-B552-582C1E75D00E@noqsi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:39:06AM -0700, John Doty wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2017, at 3:41 AM, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > > > On 18 February 2017 at 08:27, Vasily Olekhov (olekhov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Thank you John, I've got your point. > > Can you hint how should I reference CONN1 on the second page? > > It should be the same component CONN1 from the first page. > > > > This is a slightly unusual way of doing things. I _thought_ it should work, but having checked, it is actually generating a bad netlist. > > > > My Windows dual-boot has gEDA 1.6.1..... so this could be some bug which is fixed since then. What version do you use? > > > > This is a very old bug. I suppose it’s rarely encountered: most of us don’t try to do things that way. It’s still present in lepton pulled from git yesterday. Yes, this is 1) a misguiding abuse of components in schematics 2) a bug in gnetlist consisting in having no check of package consistency wrt the number of its pins and conflicting pinnumbers (and pinseqs IIUC). -- Vladimir