X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=UTSrK1igPjx0BUC5LRPkJyoAnSdVUHhNOCGHD00p7T8=;
        b=VXvxuusit1bwjI6gW2zkQa0aQrklMCObMDBUVegsTpv2PHiyhZZOl/EOYvgACfWYJx
         /JZ8YUgroMDb4gEY6gFgB/rJ3noqItsivx3aR9x+2avVsY+fEv3TL/gpJ4R0IktcsPYV
         /bssOn820fJwVu9PoCvCCDEO5QUjN9tBxs59ega09IBfdXePZM2caU9+wdYDb1laDOOc
         Wk8bbhocIsHENIymuvzIYfo4HNjykYmvxlENlKZ2xAO3q7TTrK8XYuAizuSonJciFDCP
         PK4/cF/5om3fA4fC3mOEocS4PMIayXB34V8PjZ7fFIM84A21+Kf4RUJIef9vkmR1xr1D
         GP3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=UTSrK1igPjx0BUC5LRPkJyoAnSdVUHhNOCGHD00p7T8=;
        b=Ew7V5vq86y2cYvN/geHZR5EX+AYztJhdFXW8ULbiNFG8Js2Q0VSqFH3tlCKRDY93XN
         pQ9jzc+jXdlNrhePSUezGrUo8Zsu+bN6F3RHlzaPyZojA2TfA5esJxLM3f20ZAUWWaJT
         qqpGmBagOEl4PgWuMfmStNrc8vy327N+ldyllmSQ7ySPkxgkVwc+XLrt91uJmWCvSsjZ
         oA4mRcO97jSnzcX55ruZ5kPaxd2ZtHo02xQpXe/sStxGg4ZSAE5c+9qvh6gRm+NJ0Tfj
         AgkTGIWQGsM6MwNcJ2Buckr8PWuHr7oBSOYn6AfOi5hefvt4UbmF9FbmIBaLEpMdpF0U
         v80Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkOq0mtQrRokH0F+rGDKQUay1Y4Px7f65PYIvwiU/EYIRTFfDY0JxTkZ+uP97fDEgrqgaCh9KKMR3+bieJo/z3s8VlfWg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.68.66 with SMTP id u2mr16409156obt.49.1453034559144;
 Sun, 17 Jan 2016 04:42:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1452944656.2933.13.camel@linetec>
References: <1452944656 DOT 2933 DOT 13 DOT camel AT linetec>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 12:42:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJXU7q8t12_7HrR7n460BPSXHKXjyU1eVVBGPQQdmoaefHqeVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-help] Geda-gschem update problem?
From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1fdfebe8815052986f861
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--e89a8fb1fdfebe8815052986f861
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

It sounds like the repository you pulled from may have a mix of versions.
(Perhaps a broken, or incomplete build, or a package that changed names?)

Distro and version thereof?
PPA?

Peter

On 16 January 2016 at 11:44, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via
geda-help AT delorie DOT com] <geda-help AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I appear to have a bit of a problem: after installing some updates
> (which apparently included geda-gschem), gschem is missing. When trying
> to install it manually, I get the following error message:
>
>         $ sudo apt-get install geda-gschem
>         Reading package lists... Done
>         Building dependency tree
>         Reading state information... Done
>         Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
>         requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
>         distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
>         or been moved out of Incoming.
>         The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
>         The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>          geda-gschem : Depends: libgeda43 (>=
> 1:1.9.2+git20151227-0ppa0~trusty)
>         but it is not going to be installed
>         E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> Checking with
>         dpkg --get-selections | grep hold
> tells me that no broken packages are being held. Also, trying to force
> installation of geda-gschem OR libgeda43 doesn't work.
> The latter produces an error message about a libgeda-common dependency:
>
>         apt-get -f install libgeda43
>         ...
>         The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>          libgeda43 : Depends: libgeda-common (<
> 1:1.9.2+git20151227-0ppa0~trusty.1~) but 1:1.9.2+git20160115-0ppa0~trusty
> is to be installed
>
> libgeda-common seems to be the correct and latest version already:
>
>         # apt-get -f install libgeda-common
>         Reading package lists... Done
>         Building dependency tree
>         Reading state information... Done
>         libgeda-common is already the newest version.
>
> How can I resolve this? Or is there indeed a small dependency error in
> the latest update?
>
> Thanks in advance, best regards,
>
> Richard Rasker
>
>

--e89a8fb1fdfebe8815052986f861
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>It sounds like the repository you pulled fr=
om may have a mix of versions. (Perhaps a broken, or incomplete build, or a=
 package that changed names?)<br><br></div>Distro and version thereof?<br><=
/div>PPA?<br><br></div>Peter<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote">On 16 January 2016 at 11:44, Richard Rasker (<a href=
=3D"mailto:rasker AT linetec DOT nl">rasker AT linetec DOT nl</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto=
:geda-help AT delorie DOT com">geda-help AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a=
 href=3D"mailto:geda-help AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-help AT delorie.=
com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br>
<br>
I appear to have a bit of a problem: after installing some updates<br>
(which apparently included geda-gschem), gschem is missing. When trying<br>
to install it manually, I get the following error message:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 $ sudo apt-get install geda-gschem<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Reading package lists... Done<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Building dependency tree<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Reading state information... Done<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Some packages could not be installed. This may =
mean that you have<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 requested an impossible situation or if you are=
 using the unstable<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 distribution that some required packages have n=
ot yet been created<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 or been moved out of Incoming.<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 The following information may help to resolve t=
he situation:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 The following packages have unmet dependencies:=
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0geda-gschem : Depends: libgeda43 (&gt;=3D=
 1:1.9.2+git20151227-0ppa0~trusty)<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 but it is not going to be installed<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 E: Unable to correct problems, you have held br=
oken packages.<br>
<br>
<br>
Checking with<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 dpkg --get-selections | grep hold<br>
tells me that no broken packages are being held. Also, trying to force<br>
installation of geda-gschem OR libgeda43 doesn&#39;t work.<br>
The latter produces an error message about a libgeda-common dependency:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 apt-get -f install libgeda43<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ...<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 The following packages have unmet dependencies:=
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0libgeda43 : Depends: libgeda-common (&lt;=
 1:1.9.2+git20151227-0ppa0~trusty.1~) but 1:1.9.2+git20160115-0ppa0~trusty =
is to be installed<br>
<br>
libgeda-common seems to be the correct and latest version already:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 # apt-get -f install libgeda-common<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Reading package lists... Done<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Building dependency tree<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Reading state information... Done<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 libgeda-common is already the newest version.<b=
r>
<br>
How can I resolve this? Or is there indeed a small dependency error in<br>
the latest update?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance, best regards,<br>
<br>
Richard Rasker<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--e89a8fb1fdfebe8815052986f861--